Man Utd spending won't end with £41M trio
-
Man Utd spending won't end with £43.3M trio
Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson's spending won't end at the combined fee of £43.3 million for midfield trio Owen Hargreaves £18m, Nani £14.5m and Anderson £17.8m
Fergie still wants one, or possibly two, new strikers and the likes of Barcelona's Samuel Eto'o and Tottenham's Dimitar Berbatov are still high on his agenda, says the Daily Mail.
United's massive outlay will also silence doubters over the Glazer family's commitment to the club, which was questioned last week.
Who is Spending The Money Now ? Manchester United And Ferguson is going to make more big money signings - cannot kpkb about chelsea spending liao right ? We so far spend much lesser than you all but our big name signing will arrive soon =D
Liverpool yet to spend -
Sharing news is one thing, but your agenda is a different thing. End of the day is about antagonising other people....
-
I wonder
SAF requested a £50million for transfer targets of minimum 3. Now he got 3 and still have £9million or so to spare. Who fits the bill? Or is SAF going to spend more than that amount?
Hmm......
What you guys think? -
as soon i saw the thread n the threadstarter, i knew wats the content of the thread already
-
I'm not too concerned actually, at least, not with just Man U.Originally posted by Bontakun:I wonder SAF requested a £50million for transfer targets of minimum 3. Now he got 3 and still have £9million or so to spare. Who fits the bill? Or is SAF going to spend more than that amount?
Hmm......
What you guys think? -
Posting news is one thing, but GP's comments show what his real agenda is all about.Originally posted by RaTtY8l:as soon i saw the thread n the threadstarter, i knew wats the content of the thread already -
and according to sportscenter asia
united spending in whole of 2007 is 98.9million
100 million in a year and more to come
man utd fans can shut their hell up on chelsea spendings now since their own club use so much money -
the words in black are not according to sportscentre asia. haiz so sad all the topics here are all about flaming
-
End of the day, it's about you wanting to take a potshot back at Man U fans? I see your point but I really think there's no need for this.Originally posted by ghimpheng:and according to sportscenter asia
united spending in whole of 2007 is 98.9million
100 million in a year and more to come
man utd fans can shut their hell up on chelsea spendings now since their own club use so much money -
he want to sign Ajax Ace Striker Huntelaar scored 32 goals in 47 apperances 21 of them are league goalsOriginally posted by Bontakun:I wonder SAF requested a £50million for transfer targets of minimum 3. Now he got 3 and still have £9million or so to spare. Who fits the bill? Or is SAF going to spend more than that amount?
Hmm......
What you guys think?
which i doubt will be leaving for £9million only @ least £15million or above -
u can start a normal thread, without all the criticism in it anot?
-
The problem is nv on spending only from the start.... when will u ever understand...Originally posted by ghimpheng:and according to sportscenter asia
united spending in whole of 2007 is 98.9million
100 million in a year and more to come
man utd fans can shut their hell up on chelsea spendings now since their own club use so much money
-
More will come....Originally posted by stellazio:u can start a normal thread, without all the criticism in it anot? -
To TS...
L...O...O....S....E......
I shall not complete the word... -
Yes, Faggotson is gonna spend more, since last chance liao.Originally posted by Bontakun:I wonder SAF requested a £50million for transfer targets of minimum 3. Now he got 3 and still have £9million or so to spare. Who fits the bill? Or is SAF going to spend more than that amount?
Hmm......
What you guys think?
At least when ManU is sold, he'll be the one who screwed the Glazers instead of the other way round! -
ok la all fair so tink blues or red supports can stop the talk abt spending... jz continue to talk abt football la...
-
only arsenal and their fans got the right now.
-
He has his agenda.....Originally posted by stellazio:u can start a normal thread, without all the criticism in it anot? -
yes...Originally posted by stellazio:only arsenal and their fans got the right now. -
TS immaturity is plastered all over this thread.
-
How about Reading?Originally posted by stellazio:only arsenal and their fans got the right now. -
i duno of any reading fans.Originally posted by SumOne:How about Reading?
95% of my friends man utd
the remaining 5% is chelsea+arsenal and 1 neutral. -
barcelona hereOriginally posted by stellazio:i duno of any reading fans.
95% of my friends man utd
the remaining 5% is chelsea+arsenal and 1 neutral. 
and eto'o will never leave!
unless henry comes over... -
I think Reading did well being a newly promoted team. But hopefully they won't implode like Wigan.Originally posted by stellazio:i duno of any reading fans.
95% of my friends man utd
the remaining 5% is chelsea+arsenal and 1 neutral. -
I think the thread starter missed a very important point here... Fergie is given a budget of $25m per season. Last season, they didn't use it cos the money spent on Carrick was generated by selling Rvn and thanks to Chelsea a John guy for a combine sum of $22.5m ($10.5 +$12).
Carrick cost $14m and will only reach $18.6 should Man u continue to win the EPL title and in Europe too over the duration of his present contract. Taking all this into account, United actually didn't use a cent from their last season's budget.
Profits from sales $22.5 - highest possible at $18.6 and a reserve keeper at $2.5... United still had a surplus of $1.4m and this also does not take into account that they sold some youth players too for a few hundred thousands...
So if it was base on this simple count, United actually will have $50+ millions for next season as they will have 2 seasons budgets... and also not taking into account the players they may sell during this transfer window.
The thread starter also fail to realise that while Chelsea reported a $80m lost recently and a $140m lost the year before, United still manage to post a high net profit gain during these periods... The Chelsea owner may be very rich but the United owners are not. The money spent must be earn from the sport itself just like the new Pool owners will do too and not some oil well in Russia. So in both cases there is a big difference... If you have work hard and earn from it, then no one can say you don't deserve it.
And if the Thread starter's intention is to count his chickens before his eggs again... He better pray that he won't have to eat humble pie like that Newcastle event...
Anyway, just for the TS info... no offence to all the other chelsea fans... The combine amount united spent for last season and the coming one is still much lesser than the $83 million chelsea spent just last season alone... or the $56m in 2005 and the $74m in 2004... TS, give it a thought before you start shooting your mouth again...