Roanldo Dive Again ?
-
why tiger fc only didn't make fun of barca??Originally posted by R3SsH|n:how come the tiger fc advertisment only show chelsea players diving?
the director of the ad is barca fan issit...?? -
Nah... Hardly. Lamps dun go down liddat. He goes for the jugular. Score goals.Originally posted by R3SsH|n:maybe thats lampar -
Yes, he dived. RONALDO dived. I think everyone agreed he dived and he will continue to dive from his present age to 20years later. Okie? Shiok? Let's close this thread and any other future threads about diving for next 20 years.
Okie,what's next?
MUFC cheaters??? Yes, they cheat, from day1, they cheat. They can't stop cheating. Okie? Shiok? Let's close any threads about MUFC cheating for the next 50 years.
My point -> Cause if we talking about facts (in some minds), then no point debating about facts. So we should put energy into something debatable, right, guys?? So all can have a bit of fun.
GP, can we have a new topic that is not factual but debatable by your standards?
or Marcteng_? or _marcteng? or marc_teng? -
Lol for the past few weeks sports forum so quiet now suddenly come tok abt a player from a rival club diving
But yea he did dive
But which club dont? -
x2 nothing new liao.... the diving devil.... how come the refs all still fell for his trick? damn kelong...Originally posted by 798:it's not as if the first time u know what is c. ronaldo capable of, that is DIVING!
get over it n quit whining! -
after watching the highlights, yeah he did..
kudos to Jol for not saying anything about it at the post-match interview -
it was a damn good dive, even after i se replay i still thought there was minimal contact..Originally posted by BrUtUs:x2 nothing new liao.... the diving devil.... how come the refs all still fell for his trick? damn kelong... -
Read from a news that Tiger is part of the sponsors of BarcaOriginally posted by The man who was death:why tiger fc only didn't make fun of barca??
the director of the ad is barca fan issit...??
Anyway, if Ronaldo really dive, lets hope that he will kick off this habit. Personally I think that he dived... -
butoh referee!Originally posted by BrUtUs:x2 nothing new liao.... the diving devil.... how come the refs all still fell for his trick? damn kelong...
if i am the referee, i sure send him off even if he is fouled or kena hard tackle.
-
I won't even bother and waste my time posting on such an absurd topic..
Oh sh!te I just did...
Come one, Ghimp;
Chelsea won, Man Utd won.. What more you want man?
Not happy can always go jump down mah..
-
refs act according to what they see ma..Originally posted by BrUtUs:x2 nothing new liao.... the diving devil.... how come the refs all still fell for his trick? damn kelong...
just because he's famous for diving does not mean that he dives all the time.. ok maybe 90% of the time..
-
why didn't tottenham walk off the field like thailand ?
-
They more pro leh. They wanna earn $$$ oso. $50K per week! Rich leh!!!Originally posted by ghimpheng:why didn't tottenham walk off the field like thailand ? -
censored
-
Spent more than 200m on players ONLY WIN 2 epl titles wanna haolian so much?!Originally posted by ghimpheng:champions of epl for 2 consecutive years
that why so much focus is put on chelsea and mourinho
anyway mourinho is really a very unique and funny character that why the media put so much attention on him
you're making a mockery out of the whole Chelsea contingent. You can continue disgracing yourself by making incompetent & unjustifiable remarks (whenever Man U wins); just leave the others out, will ya? -
then maybe all football and epl and manchester united forum can close down seriouslyOriginally posted by iceFatboy:Yes, he dived. RONALDO dived. I think everyone agreed he dived and he will continue to dive from his present age to 20years later. Okie? Shiok? Let's close this thread and any other future threads about diving for next 20 years.
Okie,what's next?
MUFC cheaters??? Yes, they cheat, from day1, they cheat. They can't stop cheating. Okie? Shiok? Let's close any threads about MUFC cheating for the next 50 years.
My point -> Cause if we talking about facts (in some minds), then no point debating about facts. So we should put energy into something debatable, right, guys?? So all can have a bit of fun.
GP, can we have a new topic that is not factual but debatable by your standards?
or Marcteng_? or _marcteng? or marc_teng?
i see so many factual news there how come i never see you kpkb there ???
yes we can debate about Ronaldo dirty diving antics and why does he have to do it when he is such a good player -
much better than man utd ^^ out of UCL and not even in title race last few years even with Glazers fund buy VDS , Vidic , Evra , Rooney , RonaldoOriginally posted by trendz:Spent more than 200m on players ONLY WIN 2 epl titles wanna haolian so much?!
you're making a mockery out of the whole Chelsea contingent. You can continue disgracing yourself by making incompetent & unjustifiable remarks (whenever Man U wins); just leave the others out, will ya? -
becos most "Factual News" that you post are cut and paste from Tribalfootball.Originally posted by ghimpheng:then maybe all football and epl and manchester united forum can close down seriously
i see so many factual news there how come i never see you kpkb there ???
yes we can debate about Ronaldo dirty diving antics and why does he have to do it when he is such a good player
Anyway, enough said, this is so stale.. -
you're suggesting that EPL team behave in a ASEAN football standard?Originally posted by ghimpheng:why didn't tottenham walk off the field like thailand ?
-
Originally posted by ghimpheng:much better than man utd ^^ out of UCL and not even in title race last few years even with Glazers fund buy VDS , Vidic , Evra , Rooney , Ronaldo
I seriously think you should read news about other clubs other than Chelsea cos your "facts" are just your opinions.
Rooney and Ronaldo was bought wayyyyy before Glazers took control of the club.
Also, the combination of the transfer fee paid to sign players in Glazers era: Van der Sar(2m), Park Ji Sung(4m),Ben Foster(1m), Vidic(7.2m), Evra(5.5m), Carrick(14m, potentially 18.6m), Kuszczak(Loan) and Larsson(Loan) was only a mere 38.3m. It's spare change compared to Abramovic who shelled out millions and yield only 2 EPL titles and getiing poorer and poorer each day.
Source: Wikipedia
Seek a psychiatrist GP. Think before you speak.
Cheers.
C.K -
so factual news that is not from tribalfootball is okay for debate ?Originally posted by iceFatboy:becos most "Factual News" that you post are cut and paste from Tribalfootball.
Anyway, enough said, this is so stale..
and look @ the topic did i post anything from tribalfootball.com ? -
no use putting down meOriginally posted by CKeer:
I seriously think you should read news about other clubs other than Chelsea cos your "facts" are just your opinions.
Rooney and Ronaldo was bought wayyyyy before Glazers took control of the club.
Also, the combination of the transfer fee paid to sign players in Glazers era: Van der Sar(2m), Park Ji Sung(4m),Ben Foster(1m), Vidic(7.2m), Evra(5.5m), Carrick(14m, potentially 18.6m), Kuszczak(Loan) and Larsson(Loan) was only a mere 38.3m. It's spare change compared to Abramovic who shelled out millions and yield only 2 EPL titles and getiing poorer and poorer each day.
Source: Wikipedia
Seek a psychiatrist GP. Think before you speak.
Cheers.
C.K cause your comments on me don't work well unless logical 
which more often or not is not
when man utd brought rooney and ronaldo they never win any epl or ucl or fa cup too -
As if Chelsea's multi-million pound squad won the UCL? Gimme a break. Man U's in transition; unlike Chelsea who bought established stars who flopped big time - eg: Sheva (30m) and Ballack (though this cheapskate's on a free transfer).Originally posted by ghimpheng:no use putting down me cause your comments on me don't work well unless logical which more often or not is not
when man utd brought rooney and ronaldo they never win any epl or ucl or fa cup too
Your mere 2 epl titles is bought; but giving credit where it's due - Mourinho has to get some.
I used to like Chelsea - Le Saux, Zola, Poyet, Wise, Hasselbaink, Tore Andre Flo - that period. And the fans were very humble.
Sadly, I can't say the same for now.. especially with weather-fans like GP. -
Originally posted by trendz:
Even a person of limited intelligence should know that titles can't be bought but instead by it is by completing all the matches in that league and top the league
As if Chelsea's [b]multi-million pound squad won the UCL? Gimme a break. Man U's in transition; unlike Chelsea who bought established stars who flopped big time - eg: Sheva (30m) and Ballack (though this cheapskate's on a free transfer).
Your mere 2 epl titles is bought; but giving credit where it's due - Mourinho has to get some.
I used to like Chelsea - Le Saux, Zola, Poyet, Wise, Hasselbaink, Tore Andre Flo - that period. And the fans were very humble.
Sadly, I can't say the same for now.. especially with weather-fans like GP.[/b] -
I think we straying from the Topic and becoming personal.
let's move back to Ronaldo.. sorry, who's Roanldo??
Aiyah, MUFC fans, don't be so hot... GP is talking about another person lah..
We all mistaken..
Come on, CNY coming... peace...