PTS - Chelsea vs Newcastle
-
luque is really a flop.Originally posted by R3SsH|n:come on newcastle!
he is not even convincing enough to get a first time place.
it is time he goes back to spain. -
I took Newcastle @+1.5 (2.15 times) but "spent" half of "winning" on 0-1 and 0-2.Originally posted by ghimpheng:lol really smartboy leh XD
welcome to sgforums
and rojak12 you really got bet ah ?
Overall I won (peanuts), but could have been a jackpot if Newcastle won 0-1 or 0-2! -
I did not see the match, did Newcastle nearly upset Chelsea?
-
sort of upset, Chelsea's GD is well behind MU, Newcastle stopped them from increasing GD.... plus Newcastle won on AH
-
chelsea dominated the whole matchOriginally posted by rojak12:I did not see the match, did Newcastle nearly upset Chelsea?
Shots (on Goal) 16( 8 ) 6( 1 )
Fouls 16 13
Corner Kicks 7 2
Offsides 5 2
Time of Possession 56% 44%
Yellow Cards 2 2
Red Cards 0 0
Saves 2 9
Robben almost scored ! but unfortunately once again hit the post.......he hit the post against barcelona and once again he did it very unlucky boi -
i admire your risk taking.Originally posted by rojak12:I took Newcastle @+1.5 (2.15 times) but "spent" half of "winning" on 0-1 and 0-2.
Overall I won (peanuts), but could have been a jackpot if Newcastle won 0-1 or 0-2!
newcastle have 12 players on the injury list. their strikers sucks!!!
i cannot imagine them beating chelsea.
but they have a good goalkeeper in given. -
my one is earn peanut shells only
-
hilario was crap
carlo faster recover from your injury ! -
Actually I am the reverse. The high risk takers are those who, say for example, take Chelsea for a win @ 1.15 odd and put very very very high stakes. For $1K, you win only $115. If you take Newcastle, $10 could have won you $140. But then of course, it did not happen last night.Originally posted by dragg:i admire your risk taking.
newcastle have 12 players on the injury list. their strikers sucks!!!
i cannot imagine them beating chelsea.
but they have a good goalkeeper in given.
Lucky I cover with +1.5 and that, it happened! -
Haha, then I must be then Heng to win the +1.5 wager.Originally posted by ghimpheng:chelsea dominated the whole match
Shots (on Goal) 16( 8 ) 6( 1 )
Fouls 16 13
Corner Kicks 7 2
Offsides 5 2
Time of Possession 56% 44%
Yellow Cards 2 2
Red Cards 0 0
Saves 2 9
Robben almost scored ! but unfortunately once again hit the post.......he hit the post against barcelona and once again he did it very unlucky boi -
A win is a win. $.Originally posted by smartboy4:my one is earn peanut shells only -
those are idiots more than high risk taker.Originally posted by rojak12:Actually I am the reverse. The high risk takers are those who, say for example, take Chelsea for a win @ 1.15 odd and put very very very high stakes. For $1K, you win only $115. If you take Newcastle, $10 could have won you $140. But then of course, it did not happen last night.
Lucky I cover with +1.5 and that, it happened! -
Yes if they punt every single game that way.Originally posted by dragg:those are idiots more than high risk taker. -
Mourihno was too proud, he kept his best two strikers on bench until later in the game.Originally posted by ghimpheng:chelsea dominated the whole match
Shots (on Goal) 16( 8 ) 6( 1 )
Fouls 16 13
Corner Kicks 7 2
Offsides 5 2
Time of Possession 56% 44%
Yellow Cards 2 2
Red Cards 0 0
Saves 2 9
Robben almost scored ! but unfortunately once again hit the post.......he hit the post against barcelona and once again he did it very unlucky boi -
drogba was injured and sheva was axed.Originally posted by kog:Mourihno was too proud, he kept his best two strikers on bench until later in the game. -
He could have tried starting Kalou and Robben with Sheva
-
he wanted to try out the effects of 2 wingers and it did not work thus he put drogba etc onOriginally posted by kog:Mourihno was too proud, he kept his best two strikers on bench until later in the game.
and newcastle has so many injuries , i don't see why can't jose do that