Originally posted by missqi:why u so boliao.
compare for fark.
get a life.
if you've got a life yourself, you wouldn't be posting in here from morning 9plus till midnight liao..Originally posted by missqi:why u so boliao.
compare for fark.
get a life.
You talking about cricket, soccer or lawn bowling?Originally posted by marcteng:Ist reason, not as technically talented and gifted as the europeans and latin americans.
2........................
you can add all in, even rugby.Originally posted by charlize:You talking about cricket, soccer or lawn bowling?
england always refer europe as continental.Originally posted by Ito_^:england not in europe ar?
yes, overrated is the word. cos of prevalence of epl around the world, everyone following epl think they got world class beaters.Originally posted by a-Lost-9uY:reason is very simple..
they r all super over-rated till they cant clink well as a unit..
c how other countries like ITA, BRA, GER..
they only have afew players which r very high profile other then ENG ones..
every single 1 they also say very potential/talented..
ended up all cant play along well..
walao Ah Marc,Originally posted by marcteng:the only world class england have are rooney and gerrard.
sorry to say, lampard and terry not world class. they may be good for chelsea, but they sucks for england.
england dun have a good goalie, unlike last time got seaman, shilton and ray clemence. robinson is not half as good as them.
have u ever seen lampard and terry performed well for england?Originally posted by a-Lost-9uY:walao Ah Marc,
the few key words u used will cre8 a war here leh..
"sorry to say, lampard and terry not world class. they may be good for chelsea, but they sucks for england.""--> this sentence can liao..
great. u jus made our ghimpheng unhappy.Originally posted by marcteng:have u ever seen lampard and terry performed well for england?