You think Jose would come and start chelsea's successful run without roman's money and ranieri's at least competent squad in the first place?Originally posted by ghimpheng:good reply but jose had the same problem with the chelsea players and yet won the epl title the 1st year when he manage chelsea with the rate they going,they are not going to win the la liga title or UCL title
thanks for replying it this way. was waiting for it, didn't tk u long...Originally posted by ghimpheng:good reply but jose had the same problem with the chelsea players and yet won the epl title the 1st year when he manage chelsea with the rate they going,they are not going to win the la liga title or UCL title
Originally posted by ghimpheng:i understand what u mean.....u r saying that Chelsea did not win its 2 previous championships by pure money. All the best, Chelsea may do it again this season.
[b
so money and world cup coach don't get you success after all[/b]
nah this just simply show that JM win by tatics and others too and also chelsea never lost a home game other than to barcelona in champions league last season and man utd also spent big money on players like Rooney and Ronaldo And Carrick and they bought alot of players and sold Eric Djemba Djemba , Veron , Diego Forlan and others now they bought and winning the league title twice is not easy and the winning it 3 times even with "huge money"Originally posted by Patrik:Trying to make Chelsea look better by trying to make Real Madrid look bad?![]()
![]()
![]()
that history la uncle go see the favourites for epl and the champions league favourite.......Chelsea is fav for epl title and chelsea is 2nd fav for UCL titleOriginally posted by iceFatboy:MUFC won in the 90s with own-developed players that Chelsea will never have and won the Treble.
Arsenal went through the season without losing.
Liverpool the only English club with 5 Champion Cups.
All three are superiors to Chelsea.
Stop putting Gold in your mouth.
Without Roman, would JM have accomplished anything??
Sorry, till date JM has only got 2 EPL champions, do you know how many Gunners got? How many MUFC got?
or for that fact, how many division titles Liverpool got??
You little imp, stop comparing yourselfs to the Gods okie?
chel$ki's previous 2 epl titles r also history, dumb and dumber....Originally posted by ghimpheng:that history la uncle go see the favourites for epl and the champions league favourite.......Chelsea is fav for epl title and chelsea is 2nd fav for UCL title
u only know how to look @ the past the past the past that all ? where is leeds now ? where is juventus now ??? those club with great history in lower division do anyone ever care ??? Everyone care about the preesnt ! NOW
and yes JM would acheieve something even without JM he already prove himself @ porto how many times must i say that 4 the sake of your lack of football knowledge
see it 10 years down the road let see what chelsea acheive =D you are denying chelsea TOO EARLY as chelsea just rise to the top let see will get close or not by the time i think u will come up with reason likeOriginally posted by tarcki:lol... i rem u stating tat club history is impt. now u tok like club history is nothing, the impt thing is tat u r winning now. Chelsea's stature are no where near the likes of manu, liverpool and arsenal n will nv get close.![]()
moronsOriginally posted by weiqimun:chel$ki's previous 2 epl titles r also history, dumb and dumber....
speak for yourself and them thanksOriginally posted by Rock^Star:kid, u gotta grow up. still studying right? from the cocky way u talk.
Did u even see the goal from Lampard against Reading? He ran onto the thigh of Sonko. Not to mention divers like Drogba, Robben etc.
And did u see how portugal played in WC 2006? A team full of divers, Deco and Maniche included. Where did this culture come from? PORTO.
It was also an utter disgrace watching that UEFA cup final between O'Neill's Celtic and JM's Porto. I felt very very sorry for O'Neill even though i'm not a fan of UEFA cup.
LOL... Fyi seldom ppl comment tat chelsea BUY the title. Most of the ppl says tat it makes it EASIER for them to win having given tat kind of $$ to spent. Are u confident to say tat if RA had no brought the club and pay its debt, will chelsea become what it is today in such a short time?? ask urself.. which person is more impt to chelsea, RA or JM ??Originally posted by ghimpheng:see it 10 years down the road let see what chelsea acheive =D you are denying chelsea TOO EARLY as chelsea just rise to the top let see will get close or not by the time i think u will come up with reason like
1)of coz chelsea win UCL use so much money
2)winning epl 3 times consecutive of coz la use money
3)aiyo not like man utd , arsenal , LFC use so less money please la academy also use money to invest maybe they invest alot in academy to search for the players they want who knows
4)later comment chelsea say they bring all "talented" youths over to chelsea
and if money can bring all such success then the real madrid president can cry and whine for success with their big star
lolx... and how u noe deco wad not Instructed by JM???Originally posted by ghimpheng:speak for yourself and them thanks![]()
who started talking this way 1st
and deco was a diver intially YOU sounded as IF DECO was Instructed / Taught By Jose To Dive Which is Apparaently u guyz are assuming things again
no point talking to u kiddoOriginally posted by ghimpheng:speak for yourself and them thanks![]()
who started talking this way 1st
and deco was a diver intially YOU sounded as IF DECO was Instructed / Taught By Jose To Dive Which is Apparaently u guyz are assuming things again