depends on your players strength. 4-3-3 generally you will dominate the central midfield more..
Patrik
4-3-1-2 better
thoreldan
36-24-36 best
T.Ryousuke
4-3-3 is like 4-5-1 , the two winger can be a midfielder or as striker. If the whole team move forward fast enough even the full back can support the winger to attack. If your team is slow on the both wing and no good connection from fullback and winger then you just have to depend on the attacking central midfield to support the striker. Is up to the manager to plan it play, if he allow fullback to move forward to support attack at a attacking formation he can have up to 7 players up front and leave only 2 CD and a DM behind. Players are always on the move and no point stick to the formation if you don't have a good team play, by covering each other if someone is out of his position.
SexyChin
Originally posted by thoreldan:
36-24-36 best
What are you trying to say?
T.Ryousuke
That's why good manger like to have a multi role player who can switch play during the game. Left wing to right or even to center, and it's also depend on what the opponent is strong at.
stellazio
Originally posted by SexyChin:
What are you trying to say?
female measurements.
R3SsH|n
i prefer to have wingers than 3 central midfielders... too many central midfielders too boring...
T.Ryousuke
Midfielder do have different role, defensive , attacking, winger and playmaker. They all perform different task, they normally dun put all attacking player. The most common one is diamond formation to cover the center of the park.
monoslayer
u should nv choose ur players to accommodate ur formation. instead, u should devise the best formation according to ur players' strengths n weaknesses.
Marco_Simone
the old W-M formation is best...
Master -_-
stick with 4-4-1-1...standard, classic formation
Diesel_Dimension
Rooooooney style
1-5-5!!!
Twice A Day
U created an acct on national day to ask whether 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 is better.. Planning to take up football management?
This forum sure is getting livelier...
dork3d
How about 4-5-1? Superb defensive lineup...
3-5-2 with sweeper position is generally good lineup...
ghimpheng
4-4-2 most well balanced.........and easy to use and for players to comprehend
4-5-1 when defending.......change into 4-3-3 when attacking........this is what chelsea did..........but I think chelsea going for a 4-4-2.......