reds is G.O.A.T.
-
LIVERPOOL pipped Manchester United to top spot in an all-time league table dating back to the start of the English League, published by The Times yesterday.
According to the standings, which award three points for a win and one for a draw, the 18-time English champions have 5,927 points from their 3,643 matches - an average of 1.63 points a game.
Manchester United, who have won 15 titles, were second with 5,337 points from their 3,287 matches - an average of 1.62 points per game. Arsenal, champions 13 times, are third, accumulating 5,780 points from 3,643 matches at 1.59 points a match.
Chelsea is 14th.... -
Of course la, LFC is the most successful club in UK
-
English division ma. If its just EPL den different story.
-
Notice the games MU played and Liverpool played in the 1st Division...
Livverppol has more games...
IF Mu played the same amt of games, i bet their average would be more than liverpool
-
even if its epl i don think your chelsea will be top. manu will be way ahead from the rest of the packOriginally posted by stellazio:English division ma. If its just EPL den different story. -
goodness, this is getting childish....all this statistics are nothing more than history...there once was a british empire stretching half the globe, now there is only a queen who does little else than show up at the commonwealth games...what goes up will come down, except your age...
-
did i say my chelsea will be top?Originally posted by used:even if its epl i don think your chelsea will be top. manu will be way ahead from the rest of the pack
you think i'm jealous by this stats?no, cuz like alot of you, i wasn't even borned during those times.. -
Originally posted by new_b:
u r assuming. and i am assumming tt man u will win less games if they play same # of games as liverpool.
Notice the games MU played and Liverpool played in the 1st Division...
Livverppol has more games...
[b]IF Mu played the same amt of games, i bet their average would be more than liverpool [/b]
u can only assert with a fact. -
u have no passion for this.Originally posted by countdracula:goodness, this is getting childish....all this statistics are nothing more than history...there once was a british empire stretching half the globe, now there is only a queen who does little else than show up at the commonwealth games...what goes up will come down, except your age...
hopefully there's something u r passionate about.... -
i agree totally with you.Originally posted by countdracula:goodness, this is getting childish....all this statistics are nothing more than history...there once was a british empire stretching half the globe, now there is only a queen who does little else than show up at the commonwealth games...what goes up will come down, except your age... -
tell me whats the use of history?Originally posted by weiqimun:u have no passion for this.
hopefully there's something u r passionate about....
to be like those forest fans who are still living back then?? -
Even if Chelsea continue winning the EPL for next 3-4 seasons,
they will still never be in the same league as Liverpool, Man u and Arsenal.
Chelsea simply Bought the EPL back. -
you're absolutely right. if that happens, chelsea is then indeed in a league of its own....isn't liverpool buying? didn't arsenal just buy rocsiky? manu is broke but they have a ding dong....Originally posted by ^MaRcUs^:Even if Chelsea continue winning the EPL for next 3-4 seasons,
they will still never be in the same league as Liverpool, Man u and Arsenal.
Chelsea simply Bought the EPL back. -
Yes, But they don't spend £20m on a player to warm the bench or buy a player for £25m when he's probably only worth £10mOriginally posted by countdracula:you're absolutely right. if that happens, chelsea is then indeed in a league of its own....isn't liverpool buying? didn't arsenal just buy rocsiky? manu is broke but they have a ding dong.... -
And also, It still doesn't erase the fact that LFC are Britain's most successful club and 2nd in the world while Chelsea is perhaps one of the worst
-
some of you lot really crack me up, get a real life. what do i care if whatever club is most this or worst that. does it make your life better? i don't care for chelsea nor do i even have sports channel. i respond only because i despise sour grapes who cannot accept others are better. as for rampant spending, if you've got it, fluant it. if you don't have it, buy peter crouch....lol
-
like i said, if you weren't around to enjoy their most dominant period, you shouldn't boast too much about it.
those "old birds" like poolman no offence yea?, etc..sure they were around to live it and they deserve their right to talk about it.. -
Originally posted by stellazio:like i said, if you weren't around to enjoy their most dominant period, you shouldn't boast too much about it.
those "old birds" like poolman no offence yea?, etc..sure they were around to live it and they deserve their right to talk about it..
-
then just stick to your `hallmark' tv channel and stfu!Originally posted by countdracula:some of you lot really crack me up, get a real life. what do i care if whatever club is most this or worst that. does it make your life better? i don't care for chelsea nor do i even have sports channel. i respond only because i despise sour grapes who cannot accept others are better. as for rampant spending, if you've got it, fluant it. if you don't have it, buy peter crouch....lol -
your history/legacy is part of what you are. part of your worth is based on what your legacy is, regardless of what you are, a club, country, person.Originally posted by stellazio:tell me whats the use of history?
to be like those forest fans who are still living back then??
are u proud of your leagcy, nothin' to show for or ashamed of it? it will determine what u r going to be in future.
we are not bathin' in past glory. otherwise, reds will not continue on adding cups in its trophy room. the premiership has changed, and liverpool is trying to catch up, but it doesn't negate the fact that in the history of english league, liverpool is tops.
am i jealous of other clubs' success? you bet i am, unless you are a fairweather johnson bloke who switches clubs based on who's tops. but the face of the league changes, most prominently chel$ki forcing the change. however, the club will (likely) wither faster than other clubs once abro quits. the other clubs are build on more sound foundation. -
history will only bring u backwards. tell me, would u rather ur history be written now in this few seasons, or maybe in the year 2010, you're still gonna be talking about those decades ago?Originally posted by weiqimun:your history/legacy is part of what you are. part of your worth is based on what your legacy is, regardless of what you are, a club, country, person.
are u proud of your leagcy, nothin' to show for or ashamed of it? it will determine what u r going to be in future.
we are not bathin' in past glory. otherwise, reds will not continue on adding cups in its trophy room. the premiership has changed, and liverpool is trying to catch up, but it doesn't negate the fact that in the history of english league, liverpool is tops.
am i jealous of other clubs' success? you bet i am, unless you are a fairweather johnson bloke who switches clubs based on who's tops. but the face of the league changes, most prominently chel$ki forcing the change. however, the club will (likely) wither faster than other clubs once abro quits. the other clubs are build on more sound foundation.
i for sure, wouldn't wana be talking about those 2 league titles won by my chelsea in the future, but many others won from now till then. -
okay, IF chelsea ever get into english football hall of fame with 50 cups etc.Originally posted by stellazio:history will only bring u backwards. tell me, would u rather ur history be written now in this few seasons, or maybe in the year 2010, you're still gonna be talking about those decades ago?
i for sure, wouldn't wana be talking about those 2 league titles won by my chelsea in the future, but many others won from now till then.
don't start to brag about it about how chelsea is the greatest club in england etc.
you're saying that because your team has nothing to flaunt -
let's look forward.
Go Gunners Go! -
i didn't brag about how chelsea is the greatest club. at least i was there to live it when they won. were u?Originally posted by Agenda:okay, IF chelsea ever get into english football hall of fame with 50 cups etc.
don't start to brag about it about how chelsea is the greatest club in england etc.
you're saying that because your team has nothing to flaunt -
heck, i dun even see many gunners fan bragging when they were domination the epl together with man utd.
this is the reason why man utd fans are hated, becuase alot of they love to brag during their dominant years..