Its just blatant rumours. Wheres the evidence. Even spurs have ruled out foul play.Originally posted by ghimpheng:I think the chef was arsenal fan and think that tottenham will win the match against west ham so he put abit of like not poison but something not so serious so that the spurs players is not @ 100% that the rumour that the chef of is Arsenal fan.............if it is.........I think a rematch should be fair........but the FA will not really consider the option of rematch I guess
i fink it's a bit too late to request nowOriginally posted by ghimpheng:Spurs to make formal request for West Ham game to be restaged
tribalfootball.com - May 9, 2006
Tottenham are seriously considering a formal approach to the Premier League to have their match against West Ham on Sunday restaged.
The Times says Spurs believe that they may have been treated unfairly when it became clear that as many as ten players were struck down by food poisoning on the eve of their most important match of the season on Sunday.
They are also considering studying statistics provided by ProZone, which is used to measure the performance of players in all Premiership matches, to show whether the team were unable to compete at their usual level.
Several of the unwell players said that they ate the lasagna, but there remains the possibility that one player passed around a virus.
West Ham defeat cost Spurs massive £14M
tribalfootball.com - May 9, 2006
Tottenham's defeat at West Ham United has cost the club an estimated £14 million.
Nigel Currie, director of the sports sponsorship firm brand Rapport, has told the Guardian that Spurs' failure to qualify for the Champions League will cost them a fortune.
He estimated lost TV revenue alone would be at least £2.5m and a forthcoming shirt sponsorship deal could fall from £6m to £4m, with another £1.5m lost in merchandising sales.
don't think the FA agree with spurs request even though the suitation is sympathic......
against chelsea..gallas long range effort in the 92 min..Originally posted by used:spurs cant be complaining. look at how many points they lost due to conceding goals in the dying mins.
White hart lane - vs west ham
dropped 2 pts due to Anton's goal in dying mins. 1-1
Craven cottage - vs fulham
dropped 3 points with injury time goal by fulham. 1-0
there may be a few more.
if only spurs could score more goals and kill the game off early, they could hv even challenge for 3rd spot
martin jol is a good buyer and will strength his squad tis summer. i'm sure it would not be repeated next season
i tink no link leh...Originally posted by used:spurs cant be complaining. look at how many points they lost due to conceding goals in the dying mins.
White hart lane - vs west ham
dropped 2 pts due to Anton's goal in dying mins. 1-1
Craven cottage - vs fulham
dropped 3 points with injury time goal by fulham. 1-0
there may be a few more.
if only spurs could score more goals and kill the game off early, they could hv even challenge for 3rd spot
martin jol is a good buyer and will strength his squad tis summer. i'm sure it would not be repeated next season
UCL leh...who doesn't want...Originally posted by iveco:From the way Spurs are begging for a replay, it seems like their chairman is after the UCL spot by hook or by crook.
20 million pounds gone.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:UCL leh...who doesn't want...
Better to lose to Hammers than risk getting docked three points like Boro in 1996/97.Originally posted by dragg:what if spurs have beaten west ham?
it is silly to appeal after losing the match. they should not have played that game in the first place.