America the
Illiterate
By Chris
Hedges
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21239.htm
November 16,
2008
"Truthdig"
-- - We live
in two
Americas.
One America,
now the
minority,
functions in
a
print-based,
literate
world. It
can cope
with
complexity
and has the
intellectual
tools to
separate
illusion
from truth.
The other
America,
which
constitutes
the
majority,
exists in a
non-reality-based
belief
system. This
America,
dependent on
skillfully
manipulated
images for
information,
has severed
itself from
the
literate,
print-based
culture. It
cannot
differentiate
between lies
and truth.
It is
informed by
simplistic,
childish
narratives
and clichés.
It is thrown
into
confusion by
ambiguity,
nuance and
self-reflection.
This divide,
more than
race, class
or gender,
more than
rural or
urban,
believer or
nonbeliever,
red state or
blue state,
has split
the country
into
radically
distinct,
unbridgeable
and
antagonistic
entities.
There are
over 42
million
American
adults, 20
percent of
whom hold
high school
diplomas,
who cannot
read, as
well as the
50 million
who read at
a fourth- or
fifth-grade
level.
Nearly a
third of the
nation’s
population
is
illiterate
or barely
literate.
And their
numbers are
growing by
an estimated
2 million a
year. But
even those
who are
supposedly
literate
retreat in
huge numbers
into this
image-based
existence. A
third of
high school
graduates,
along with
42 percent
of college
graduates,
never read a
book after
they finish
school.
Eighty
percent of
the families
in the
United
States last
year did not
buy a book.
The
illiterate
rarely vote,
and when
they do vote
they do so
without the
ability to
make
decisions
based on
textual
information.
American
political
campaigns,
which have
learned to
speak in the
comforting
epistemology
of images,
eschew real
ideas and
policy for
cheap
slogans and
reassuring
personal
narratives.
Political
propaganda
now
masquerades
as ideology.
Political
campaigns
have become
an
experience.
They do not
require
cognitive or
self-critical
skills. They
are designed
to ignite
pseudo-religious
feelings of
euphoria,
empowerment
and
collective
salvation.
Campaigns
that succeed
are
carefully
constructed
psychological
instruments
that
manipulate
fickle
public
moods,
emotions and
impulses,
many of
which are
subliminal.
They create
a public
ecstasy that
annuls
individuality
and fosters
a state of
mindlessness.
They thrust
us into an
eternal
present.
They cater
to a nation
that now
lives in a
state of
permanent
amnesia. It
is style and
story, not
content or
history or
reality,
which inform
our politics
and our
lives. We
prefer happy
illusions.
And it works
because so
much of the
American
electorate,
including
those who
should know
better,
blindly cast
ballots for
slogans,
smiles, the
cheerful
family
tableaux,
narratives
and the
perceived
sincerity
and the
attractiveness
of
candidates.
We confuse
how we feel
with
knowledge.
The
illiterate
and
semi-literate,
once the
campaigns
are over,
remain
powerless.
They still
cannot
protect
their
children
from
dysfunctional
public
schools.
They still
cannot
understand
predatory
loan deals,
the
intricacies
of mortgage
papers,
credit card
agreements
and equity
lines of
credit that
drive them
into
foreclosures
and
bankruptcies.
They still
struggle
with the
most basic
chores of
daily life
from reading
instructions
on medicine
bottles to
filling out
bank forms,
car loan
documents
and
unemployment
benefit and
insurance
papers. They
watch
helplessly
and without
comprehension
as hundreds
of thousands
of jobs are
shed. They
are hostages
to brands.
Brands come
with images
and slogans.
Images and
slogans are
all they
understand.
Many eat at
fast food
restaurants
not only
because it
is cheap but
because they
can order
from
pictures
rather than
menus. And
those who
serve them,
also
semi-literate
or
illiterate,
punch in
orders on
cash
registers
whose keys
are marked
with symbols
and
pictures.
This is our
brave new
world.
Political
leaders in
our
post-literate
society no
longer need
to be
competent,
sincere or
honest. They
only need to
appear to
have these
qualities.
Most of all
they need a
story, a
narrative.
The reality
of the
narrative is
irrelevant.
It can be
completely
at odds with
the facts.
The
consistency
and
emotional
appeal of
the story
are
paramount.
The most
essential
skill in
political
theater and
the consumer
culture is
artifice.
Those who
are best at
artifice
succeed.
Those who
have not
mastered the
art of
artifice
fail. In an
age of
images and
entertainment,
in an age of
instant
emotional
gratification,
we do not
seek or want
honesty. We
ask to be
indulged and
entertained
by clichés,
stereotypes
and mythic
narratives
that tell us
we can be
whomever we
want to be,
that we live
in the
greatest
country on
Earth, that
we are
endowed with
superior
moral and
physical
qualities
and that our
glorious
future is
preordained,
either
because of
our
attributes
as Americans
or because
we are
blessed by
God or both.
The ability
to magnify
these simple
and childish
lies, to
repeat them
and have
surrogates
repeat them
in endless
loops of
news cycles,
gives these
lies the
aura of an
uncontested
truth. We
are
repeatedly
fed words or
phrases like
yes we can,
maverick,
change,
pro-life,
hope or war
on terror.
It feels
good not to
think. All
we have to
do is
visualize
what we
want,
believe in
ourselves
and summon
those hidden
inner
resources,
whether
divine or
national,
that make
the world
conform to
our desires.
Reality is
never an
impediment
to our
advancement.
The
Princeton
Review
analyzed the
transcripts
of the
Gore-Bush
debates, the
Clinton-Bush-Perot
debates of
1992, the
Kennedy-Nixon
debates of
1960 and the
Lincoln-Douglas
debates of
1858. It
reviewed
these
transcripts
using a
standard
vocabulary
test that
indicates
the minimum
educational
standard
needed for a
reader to
grasp the
text. During
the 2000
debates,
George W.
Bush spoke
at a
sixth-grade
level (6.7)
and Al Gore
at a
seventh-grade
level (7.6).
In the 1992
debates,
Bill Clinton
spoke at a
seventh-grade
level (7.6),
while George
H.W. Bush
spoke at a
sixth-grade
level (6.8),
as did H.
Ross Perot
(6.3). In
the debates
between John
F. Kennedy
and Richard
Nixon, the
candidates
spoke in
language
used by
10th-graders.
In the
debates of
Abraham
Lincoln and
Stephen A.
Douglas the
scores were
respectively
11.2 and
12.0. In
short,
today’s
political
rhetoric is
designed to
be
comprehensible
to a
10-year-old
child or an
adult with a
sixth-grade
reading
level. It is
fitted to
this level
of
comprehension
because most
Americans
speak, think
and are
entertained
at this
level. This
is why
serious film
and theater
and other
serious
artistic
expression,
as well as
newspapers
and books,
are being
pushed to
the margins
of American
society.
Voltaire was
the most
famous man
of the 18th
century.
Today the
most famous
“person” is
Mickey
Mouse.
In our
post-literate
world,
because
ideas are
inaccessible,
there is a
need for
constant
stimulus.
News,
political
debate,
theater, art
and books
are judged
not on the
power of
their ideas
but on their
ability to
entertain.
Cultural
products
that force
us to
examine
ourselves
and our
society are
condemned as
elitist and
impenetrable.
Hannah
Arendt
warned that
the
marketization
of culture
leads to its
degradation,
that this
marketization
creates a
new
celebrity
class of
intellectuals
who,
although
well read
and informed
themselves,
see their
role in
society as
persuading
the masses
that
“Hamlet” can
be as
entertaining
as “The Lion
King” and
perhaps as
educational.
“Culture,”
she wrote,
“is being
destroyed in
order to
yield
entertainment.”
“There are
many great
authors of
the past who
have
survived
centuries of
oblivion and
neglect,”
Arendt
wrote, “but
it is still
an open
question
whether they
will be able
to survive
an
entertaining
version of
what they
have to
say.”
The change
from a
print-based
to an
image-based
society has
transformed
our nation.
Huge
segments of
our
population,
especially
those who
live in the
embrace of
the
Christian
right and
the consumer
culture, are
completely
unmoored
from
reality.
They lack
the capacity
to search
for truth
and cope
rationally
with our
mounting
social and
economic
ills. They
seek
clarity,
entertainment
and order.
They are
willing to
use force to
impose this
clarity on
others,
especially
those who do
not speak as
they speak
and think as
they think.
All the
traditional
tools of
democracies,
including
dispassionate
scientific
and
historical
truth,
facts, news
and rational
debate, are
useless
instruments
in a world
that lacks
the capacity
to use them.
As we
descend into
a
devastating
economic
crisis, one
that Barack
Obama cannot
halt, there
will be tens
of millions
of Americans
who will be
ruthlessly
thrust
aside. As
their houses
are
foreclosed,
as their
jobs are
lost, as
they are
forced to
declare
bankruptcy
and watch
their
communities
collapse,
they will
retreat even
further into
irrational
fantasy.
They will be
led toward
glittering
and
self-destructive
illusions by
our modern
Pied
Pipers—our
corporate
advertisers,
our
charlatan
preachers,
our
television
news
celebrities,
our
self-help
gurus, our
entertainment
industry and
our
political
demagogues—who
will offer
increasingly
absurd forms
of escapism.
The core
values of
our open
society, the
ability to
think for
oneself, to
draw
independent
conclusions,
to express
dissent when
judgment and
common sense
indicate
something is
wrong, to be
self-critical,
to challenge
authority,
to
understand
historical
facts, to
separate
truth from
lies, to
advocate for
change and
to
acknowledge
that there
are other
views,
different
ways of
being, that
are morally
and socially
acceptable,
are dying.
Obama used
hundreds of
millions of
dollars in
campaign
funds to
appeal to
and
manipulate
this
illiteracy
and
irrationalism
to his
advantage,
but these
forces will
prove to be
his most
deadly
nemesis once
they collide
with the
awful
reality that
awaits us.