If you read the new paper, you will find that his comments of Arsenal are usually negative. he always repeating how arsenal is not as good as man u at attacking or this and that, and how breathtaking ronaldo is.
it seriously irritates me. he keeps praising man u, saying how wonderful evra is la, how saha is master poacher, ronaldo is brilliant, best player la.. all this while claiming he is an arsenal fan. seriously just say you support man u and i won't get so pissed.
ronaldo is like, miss so many free kick, he can forget. and he never ever does well in an important match. evra is a joke la. got see how many time people have to track back for him...
even the new paper columnists(non-arsenal fans) sometimes feel he is a bit too negative abt arsenal
AHHHHHHHHHHHH
i let it out..
agree! seem to me he is more like a manure fan to me.
most of his remarks r praising our main rivals n condemning us.
长他人之气,贬自己�风
!
no use 1 la
we manure fans are used to your criticism already
Damn agree la. Even when arsenal won he keep saying the maturity is not there, the depth is not enough, BLAH BLAH BLAH.. Hey hello? Even Edwin yeo, a spurs friend can comment a more neutral view.
actually most of tnp sport reporters r bias one.
when other clubs except manu lost a match or drop points, they will say title hope is over. but when manu drop points, they will say manu still have IT to keep going.
hahaha, we have to prove them wrong.
i despise him more than ever! i think he is more like manure dat he even predict us to draw our next two matches.