Originally posted by BrUtUs:nowadays teams play 10man against gunners n hope for counter so its not surprise they do tat... dun see it as an insult... maybe it only affects u...
yoohoo! can u count?Originally posted by zocoss:
It seems like every team plays that way against the top 4 these days, its only up to them to unlock their opponents goal thats all, its nothing new... To be honest, even the top 4 teams do play that way too when they have take the lead. But the match stats tells a different story it seems... They had equal shots on goal, Possession almost level and in fact, Gunners keeper seem to have to make more saved in that match too... And the best chance of the match seem to be Portsmouth's from Benjani...
Perhaps in your perceptive mind in wanting the gunners to win badly, you somehow over look the performance of Portsmouth... Possible ?
wow... nice fo u to bring in the stats here BUT then stats dun always tell the correct story... yes portsmouth did get their chances esp on the break... but most of the time they were not bringin the game to gunners... and u cant reali say getting a shot on goal means they r truely creating a chance... yes top 4 do defend their lead but tats when they r leading wheras other teams jz seek a draw or a lucky break... only 1 team impress me is boro cos they did not back down in their match... even they were leading they continue to attack... yes gunners lost tat time but i do enjoy the match cos boro did their job to play the game... portsmouth match is not tat bad as some teams r much more negative than them... yes gunners were not tat gd in tat match but right now we r not jz talking abt tat match...Originally posted by zocoss:http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q60/zocos/MS1.jpg
It seems like every team plays that way against the top 4 these days, its only up to them to unlock their opponents goal thats all, its nothing new... To be honest, even the top 4 teams do play that way too when they have take the lead. But the match stats tells a different story it seems... They had equal shots on goal, Possession almost level and in fact, Gunners keeper seem to have to make more saved in that match too... And the best chance of the match seem to be Portsmouth's from Benjani...
Perhaps in your perceptive mind in wanting the gunners to win badly, you somehow over look the performance of Portsmouth... Possible ?
Yoohoo, can you see the ( ) means (on Goal) ? Shots to the far corner of the flag also you count ah?Originally posted by 798:yoohoo! can u count?
9 is not equal to 14. both goalies save the equal numbers of goals
Arsenal have more shots n possess.
it doesnt matter wat static say, portmouth play negative football.
well, of course gunners r not playing well in this match too.
Lets face it, man to man, they are indeed inferior to the gunners so the next best thing to do is to count on strategy right? And i never say they are or not playing negative football. I only say the stats suggest otherwise from some of the poster here who says they did.Originally posted by BrUtUs:wow... nice fo u to bring in the stats here BUT then stats dun always tell the correct story... yes portsmouth did get their chances esp on the break... but most of the time they were not bringin the game to gunners... and u cant reali say getting a shot on goal means they r truely creating a chance... yes top 4 do defend their lead but tats when they r leading wheras other teams jz seek a draw or a lucky break... only 1 team impress me is boro cos they did not back down in their match... even they were leading they continue to attack... yes gunners lost tat time but i do enjoy the match cos boro did their job to play the game... portsmouth match is not tat bad as some teams r much more negative than them... yes gunners were not tat gd in tat match but right now we r not jz talking abt tat match...
tink no point wasting time arguing over tis as many times ur views on matches is reali somewat funi... so jz continue enjoying the game ya...
Well,I dont think pompey palyed negative football. But I do agree that they were defensive and try to counter Arsenal whenever they can but unfortunately they managed to do it twice I think?Well,if you are still not satisfied,you can watch the full game again instead of highlights.Originally posted by zocoss:Lets face it, man to man, they are indeed inferior to the gunners so the next best thing to do is to count on strategy right? And i never say they are or not playing negative football. I only say the stats suggest otherwise from some of the poster here who says they did.
And i find what you said "u cant reali say getting a shot on goal means they r truely creating a chance." a bit funny cos if you don't create a chance, then how do you get a shot on goal? Apart from the GK scoring, i can't think of another way without creating...
The team that impress you is Middlesbrough? How long has Gareth Southgate been a manager compare to Harry Redknapp? Look at the table and see where is Middlesbrough... Southgate maybe don't even have the football manager's license yet i think... Maybe you can look at Keegan's Newcastle for a reason too.
And just one final thing... Just happen that I am watching First Edition right now on ch 23 and Richard Keys also don't agree that Pompey was too defensive or negative.
There is nothing to be satisfied or not satisfied at all, I agree that Pompey may have played defensively but like i have said, its just a strategy they used. Most teams play that way against the top 4, not only against the gunners... But for some here to say they were playing negative football is rather over the top don't you agree?Originally posted by felirox:Well,I dont think pompey palyed negative football. But I do agree that they were defensive and try to counter Arsenal whenever they can but unfortunately they managed to do it twice I think?Well,if you are still not satisfied,you can watch the full game again instead of highlights.
No lah, i am only here for discussion and helping turbie to boost the gunners folder...Originally posted by 798:suddenly i realise dat zocoss is so concern about Gunners esp when Gunners r so off-form.
well, without faggotson, i dun see man u can even win tonite.Originally posted by bryanw:we must win this game and hope man u mess up
spurs game is always exciting wif alot of goals.Originally posted by felirox:We need to win this!! An our rival,sp*rs beat reading 6-4. 10 goals. And berbatov..simply a class striker. Pls arsenal..win!!
if want to play, please drop ade n eboue n play bendtner!Originally posted by pierre^^:Wenger better DUN PLAY 4-5-1 again !
if not i am going to play ps2 instead
surprise wif the line-up.Originally posted by felirox:wah! adebayor is dropped! im suprised!!
almunia
sagna toure gallas clichy
Hleb flamini fabregas diaby
eduardo bendnter