Good lor. If I know, I should have gone in with a rebellious mindset, not going to believe what she says.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I was not brain washed.
I still feel that the Q&A session is too short le.. Not much quality questions were asked.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Good lor. If I know, I should have gone in with a rebellious mindset, not going to believe what she says.
Not too many quality questions asked, but at least the burning questions were asked. But the answer not to my liking! All the warp logic.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I still feel that the Q&A session is too short le.. Not much quality questions were asked.
She said "a reduction in budget", not revenue.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Reduced taxes doesn't mean increased revenues. Rather, it means a reduction in revenues. Take for example corporate taxes. From 35% to 30%, it's a 5% drop, which is a lot, considering that corporations do earn a decent amount.
Haha, yeah.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Reminds me of the time Indranee Rajah came to speak at NUS.
But the loudest applause and a standing ovation was reserved for Chiam See Tong, and rightly so.
I remembered wrongly.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:She said "a reduction in budget", not revenue.
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Not too many quality questions asked, but at least the burning questions were asked. But the answer not to my liking! All the warp logic.
Never. The moment she sprouted that minsters took a pay cut during the bad economical period, never had their pay adjusted in the last 6 years already gives me a reason to shut my mind and stopped listening to whatever crap she's going to say.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:
So do you agree with her answer about ministrial payrise?
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Never. The moment she sprouted that minsters took a pay cut during the bad economical period, never had their pay adjusted in the last 6 years already gives me a reason to shut my mind and stopped listening to whatever crap she's going to say.
It's when she talked about the ministers' salaries part... and the unpopular ways of PAP...Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:
I believe that not all are, especially the new ones who were brought in during the last GE.Originally posted by Rock^Star:Problem is....these people are brainwashed. They believe that what they say is true.
So what is there to talk?
Show me one PAP person who hasn't been brainwashed.
If he doesn't break the laws within the next few years. There's a chance he will be here. But unlikely RP will invite...Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I wonder if RP ask CSJ to come and have a talk, who will attend ar..
/duckie raise up hand.
hmM~ yar.. I think CCC wont invite him de.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:If he doesn't break the laws within the next few years. There's a chance he will be here. But unlikely RP will invite...
I have outlines le, now slowly typing.Originally posted by Gay 2:dunno what to write for the rj
wha care to share ?Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I have outlines le, now slowly typing.
I think the RJ is read by the CCC bah.. I guess PAP won't be reading your RJ..Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I realize I'm actually bootlicking PAP when I wrote the RJ.
Honesty is hardly a virtue in this situation.
Read by CCC, but Internet is owned by Government. I'm not going to take risk.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I think the RJ is read by the CCC bah.. I guess PAP won't be reading your RJ..
hMM~ But if CCC support PAP hor, then good lor. bootlick them = get CE point.
what's so confusing? it's to help the POOROriginally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I don't know, that's what I understood. The GST package thingy is so confusing.