Teacher =/= Facilitators.Originally posted by rainee:It is not easy to guide the students to learn...
You won't know until you become a teacher yourself
Care to elaborate?Originally posted by ChingAlvin:But i think PBL is really under-rated
Young ones - most are part time. Come here to earn money.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I think those facilitators at RP it's because they can't join MOE.
Some is very very old, and some is very very young. At first glances you can tell that those oldies are just gotten retrenched, youngster are those who doesn't have the material to become MOE teacher.
Tsk tsk tsk.. Some even more pro ar. Have the mentality that RP staff work lessr than MOE stuff but gets equal or more pay.
See. Those faci who said they believe in PBL are just bullshi++ing. If they believe in PBL, then explain to me how they got their degree?! Unless they get their degree from a tertiary institution which uses PBL too, then say no more!
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Sadly but i've got to agree, My cognitive processes in Sem 1 and Sem 2 are both young teachers, and i got nothing less then A for 32 lessons. Then Enterprise, during sem 1 its a pretty young teacher, my results are pretty satisfying, but sem 2, a very experienced teacher, they are much tougher to handle, results also not as good as expected.
Young ones - most are part time. Come here to earn money.
Old ones - those are the ones that may screw you up. They are from the industries and has lots of experience. They are not people whom you can crap and bullsh[b]it your way through. They know more than you. Those are the ones that will make super hard to research and argue.
All my third year facs are like this. They can screw me for all I care, I throw facts at them, nothing to say, I win. [/b]
Seems so only, especially Science and Tech students.Originally posted by 105090:RP seems to be maintaining a low profile for now..
and i wonder if their PBL actually produces results acadamically
Yeah... because the young ones don't have much experience, if any. All they know is theory.Originally posted by ChingAlvin:Sadly but i've got to agree, My cognitive processes in Sem 1 and Sem 2 are both young teachers, and i got nothing less then A for 32 lessons. Then Enterprise, during sem 1 its a pretty young teacher, my results are pretty satisfying, but sem 2, a very experienced teacher, they are much tougher to handle, results also not as good as expected.
I don't agree. leh..Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Seems so only, especially Science and Tech students.
All of them are wo wu chang long
Your batch ba... not quite in my batch.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I don't agree. leh..
If you ask all the SAS and SIT student why they come to RP hor, I am sure most of them they'll tell you that no other school accept them, and they doesn't want to go ITE.
Good for you. If we conduct a full scale survey on these few controversial questions hor, I think RP can close down liao.Originally posted by ChingAlvin:When i compare PBL and the conventional method, i think i actually learn more from PBL, and the good thing is, i learn things my way, so i remember them better, instead of forcing them in.
I dunno. But untill a full scale survey can be done, nothing can be confirmed.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Your batch ba... not quite in my batch.
Agree.Originally posted by ChingAlvin:But i've really got to say STA students are really have what it takes. I am STA student myself, i've seen their art pieces and creative pieces, it impresses.
Yea me too. After 11weeks in rp, the only thing I learnt are from the talks and seminars..Originally posted by diceguy:2 and half years in rp and i can say that i learn nothing
You did learn something from the talks and seminars organized.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:Yea me too. After 11weeks in rp, the only thing I learnt are from the talks and seminars..
YuP!Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:You did learn something from the talks and seminars organized.