Crappers dead?
-
u r welcome here.....Originally posted by kopiosatu:i wanna crap too.
-
arrr okok..Originally posted by Parka:
Me went to a shop today. Then they show me all the photos shot using different MPs. All are in A4 printed pages. But upon calculating the dimensions. 3.2 is like the area of 4 15ich monitors. I don't think anyone has, no, any normal people would be printing something that big.
Let me calculate the maximum size the 2 MP can print, pixel for pixel......
ur screen is at 72dpi. so 7200 pixels will take 100 inches of screen space.. obviously no (sane) person would have that much screen space..
print however is different. the usual offset print (considered low quality) that u see in those free magazines (like IS and Juice) is printed at about 150-170 dpi.
inkjet printers CLAIM they can do 1200dpi... i dunno how the technology really works but as u would appreciate the higher the dpi, the sharper the picture, PROVIDED the source is sharp.
so if u are printing at say 720dpi, a 7200 pixel long image will come out at only 10" long, a far cry from the 100" on screen.
and oh.. printing at 72 dpi will just induce blood vomitting..
-
yoz welcum den njOy crapping~Originally posted by kopiosatu:i wanna crap too.
-
who indulges in photography here, scenery, not nudity
-
i would if i had a decent camera!!Originally posted by kopiosatu:who indulges in photography here, scenery, not nudity
-
get the Canon G3Originally posted by jOhO:i would if i had a decent camera!! -
planesOriginally posted by kopiosatu:who indulges in photography here, scenery, not nudity v -
thinking of... it's between that and CP5700 (Nikon)Originally posted by kopiosatu:get the Canon G3
i would prefer the nikon, but it's much more ex.. and singapore very limited stock. -
Originally posted by jOhO:arrr okok..
ur screen is at 72dpi. so 7200 pixels will take 100 inches of screen space.. obviously no (sane) person would have that much screen space..
print however is different. the usual offset print (considered low quality) that u see in those free magazines (like IS and Juice) is printed at about 150-170 dpi.
inkjet printers CLAIM they can do 1200dpi... i dunno how the technology really works but as u would appreciate the higher the dpi, the sharper the picture, PROVIDED the source is sharp.
so if u are printing at say 720dpi, a 7200 pixel long image will come out at only 10" long, a far cry from the 100" on screen.
and oh.. printing at 72 dpi will just induce blood vomitting.. I think the photos they showed me came out of something really good. Is dpi smaller than ppi? I can't see any pixels on those photos. It blew me away. -
i would get the g3, coz my fren has a g2... and its simple to use.Originally posted by jOhO:thinking of... it's between that and CP5700 (Nikon)
i would prefer the nikon, but it's much more ex.. and singapore very limited stock.
the function i use the most is exposure... give me a long road, and dim lights, set shutter speed to 4seconds... woooo i love photos.
i use them for my desktop! -
Seems that most of the problems the reviewers are facing are the flash under low lighting conditions, inablility to focus on low light, low battery life and no camera casing.
-
hmm yeah i've used canon SLRs b4 and they're very user frenly. Nikons have a harder learning curve, and i've never used one b4.. but i can't get past the 8x ozoom and 5mp on the CP5700.. and to top it off with a cherry it looks damn CHIO~~~~!!!Originally posted by kopiosatu:i would get the g3, coz my fren has a g2... and its simple to use.
the function i use the most is exposure... give me a long road, and dim lights, set shutter speed to 4seconds... woooo i love photos.
i use them for my desktop!
lau nuah~~
=P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
shouldn't they be showing u photos printed from the camera that u wanna buy as a demo?Originally posted by Parka: I think the photos they showed me came out of something really good. Is dpi smaller than ppi? I can't see any pixels on those photos. It blew me away. -
Originally posted by jOhO:shouldn't they be showing u photos printed from the camera that u wanna buy as a demo? Yupz. Those were the photos from the camera, as they claimed. Don't know how real. haha
-
did u go sim lim? i hate sim lim, they are all CON MEN!Originally posted by Parka: Yupz. Those were the photos from the camera, as they claimed. Don't know how real. haha
Con men i tell u!! (in a shaky scary voice) bewwaaaare the salesmen of siiiim liiiiim -
aiyah to me the low light crap is really crap lor.. who the hell is gonna take pics in total darkness anyway? and when they mean low light.. they mean LOWWWWW light... not like u go bbq outing at night that kind of low... even lower..Originally posted by Parka: Seems that most of the problems the reviewers are facing are the flash under low lighting conditions, inablility to focus on low light, low battery life and no camera casing.
batt life can be overcome by getting extra batts... that's why some cams use off the shelf AA but of course most users buy rechargeable NiMH. but it makes the camera heavy.
camera casing er.. can get aftermarket i guess eheh.. -
ahhah u clown..Originally posted by kopiosatu:did u go sim lim? i hate sim lim, they are all CON MEN!
Con men i tell u!! (in a shaky scary voice) bewwaaaare the salesmen of siiiim liiiiim
well u can go to simlim if u know wat u are doing. if u go there for info and advice.. u can forget it! ehehhe... -
Originally posted by kopiosatu:did u go sim lim? i hate sim lim, they are all CON MEN!
Con men i tell u!! (in a shaky scary voice) bewwaaaare the salesmen of siiiim liiiiim Nay. I went Outram. Just some electronic shop. -
Originally posted by jOhO:aiyah to me the low light crap is really crap lor.. who the hell is gonna take pics in total darkness anyway? and when they mean low light.. they mean LOWWWWW light... not like u go bbq outing at night that kind of low... even lower..
batt life can be overcome by getting extra batts... that's why some cams use off the shelf AA but of course most users buy rechargeable NiMH. but it makes the camera heavy.
camera casing er.. can get aftermarket i guess eheh.. Hmmm...Like that I think it's pretty obvious already, from the information I gathered from the website. The winner goes to Canon. They have spectacular reviews. Wow. Think me going to get one canon too. Hmm. Should be the A40, not the 330 any more. Not much difference except in the price. -
yah, everything the shop sells is cheap and good!Originally posted by jOhO:ahhah u clown..
well u can go to simlim if u know wat u are doing. if u go there for info and advice.. u can forget it! ehehhe...
the shop beside them can be selling one for $5 and theirs is going for $100, they'll still go 'cheap and good! any problem, just come back!' and they use the jedi mind trick on you... u just go 'duhhhhh i 'll get it!' -
Originally posted by kopiosatu:yah, everything the shop sells is cheap and good!
the shop beside them can be selling one for $5 and theirs is going for $100, they'll still go 'cheap and good! any problem, just come back!' and they use the jedi mind trick on you... u just go 'duhhhhh i 'll get it!' Read on the computer times once. "Sim lim is the place for people who know what they want." -
yeah i heard there got some camera shops too? any good with their service?Originally posted by Parka: Nay. I went Outram. Just some electronic shop. -
Originally posted by jOhO:yeah i heard there got some camera shops too? any good with their service? Erm. How to grade them? Because they have too many cameras displaying, so very hard to introduce to us one by one. Again, we have to know what we want. I think all these information we want must really dig from websites and reviews. Or else just by standing there can't get anything much.
-
true also...
but nothing beats the buying experience, like when i went to a shop and held in my hand the CP5700 for the first time. i already knew the cam inside out in "theory" but when i held it.. i was orgasmic... muahahhahahahhaha
-
helloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo?
no one else here liow ar?